Regional atlases: A summary survey
- Publication
- Geographical Review
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-432
Cameroon · Version 1
1975This survey's note on the Atlas du Cameroun records that the first of a projected five parts had appeared and the second was to follow shortly. Drawing on a preliminary notice by F. Bonnet-Dupeyron, director of research at the Institut de Recherches Scientifiques du Cameroun, it dates the project's conception to 1956, when rapid development in Cameroun created an urgent need for a comprehensive study, and reads the maps and their accompanying texts as evidence that French cartographic and scientific resources were being fully used. Plate 1 (two sheets), a 1:1,000,000 geology map compiled by J. Gazel of the Service Géologique du Cameroun; plates 3 and 4, rainfall (with 1:10,000,000 insets) and mean annual and monthly temperatures; and plates 5, 6 and 7, orohydrography, pedology and phytogeography at 1:2,000,000, are itemized. The reviewer closes by hoping nothing will prevent continued production of this useful work. The notice concerns the opening parts of the project, not the finished publication.
View whole-article summary
This article provides a systematic summary review of approximately one hundred regional atlases from around the world, organized primarily by continent (or other large region) and then alphabetically by country within each group. The author begins by noting that the ever-increasing flood of atlases—national, regional, topical, and special—makes individual reviews impossible, thus necessitating summary evaluations to acknowledge important publications while respecting space constraints. The review covers representative works from Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, North America, and South America, encompassing road atlases, historical-geographical atlases, national atlases, climatic atlases, economic atlases, and school atlases. Each atlas is assessed in terms of its compiling institution, editors, scales, number of plates, content structure, cartographic techniques, printing quality, and scholarly value, with notable features and shortcomings highlighted. For instance, the European section evaluates works such as the Euroatlas, Atlas östliches Mitteleuropa, Atlas von Niederösterreich, Atlas de Belgique, Climatic Atlas of Czechoslovakia, Atlas of Denmark, and Atlas of Finland, while the American section covers state atlases from Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, Ohio, and West Virginia, as well as national atlases from Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela. The article emphasizes that these atlases not only reflect the research standards of geography and cartography in their respective countries but also serve as vital references for regional planning, economic development, historical research, and education. The author concludes by acknowledging that no single individual can possess sufficient expertise across all aspects of geography, cartography, and linguistics to render definitive critical judgments, yet such summaries offer valuable guidance to scholars, with a forthcoming review of world atlases and special atlases announced.
Related Atlases
Comments
Loading...
0/2000
















