Atlas of the BSSR
RUАтлас БССР
Belarus · 1958
Related Reviews & Articles
Integrated regional geographic atlases
K. A. Salishchev · 1964
The author reviews work on atlases of Soviet republics and oblasts published in 1961–64, containing maps on physical geography, population, economy and culture. He finds that these atlases suffer from a lack of practical purposefulness and inadequate coordination. These weaknesses are to be remedied in a new coordinated project of natural-resource atlases of the major republics and economic regions of the USSR initiated in 1963.
About the Atlas of the Byelorussian SSR
Н. Ф. Леонтьев; З. И. Мартынова; А. А. Минц · 1959
This article provides a comprehensive review of the Atlas of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, a comprehensive national atlas published to mark the 40th anniversary of the republic. The atlas integrates physical, economic, population, cultural, and historical information. The author analyzes its structure and content in detail, covering natural maps (geology, climate, hydrology, soils, vegetation), economic maps (industry, agriculture, resources), population and cultural maps, and historical maps, evaluating their cartographic methods, depth, and design quality. While recognizing the atlas as a significant achievement in Soviet cartography, the author identifies certain shortcomings, including inconsistencies between some maps, the absence of synthetic maps, excessive detail in climate mapping at the expense of key elements, and a lack of innovation in physical maps. The article concludes by emphasizing the atlas's role as a model for similar regional atlases in other Soviet republics.
Regional atlases: a summary survey
Ena L. Yonge · 1962
This article provides a systematic summary review of approximately one hundred regional atlases from around the world, organized primarily by continent (or other large region) and then alphabetically by country within each group. The author begins by noting that the ever-increasing flood of atlases—national, regional, topical, and special—makes individual reviews impossible, thus necessitating summary evaluations to acknowledge important publications while respecting space constraints. The review covers representative works from Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, North America, and South America, encompassing road atlases, historical-geographical atlases, national atlases, climatic atlases, economic atlases, and school atlases. Each atlas is assessed in terms of its compiling institution, editors, scales, number of plates, content structure, cartographic techniques, printing quality, and scholarly value, with notable features and shortcomings highlighted. For instance, the European section evaluates works such as the Euroatlas, Atlas östliches Mitteleuropa, Atlas von Niederösterreich, Atlas de Belgique, Climatic Atlas of Czechoslovakia, Atlas of Denmark, and Atlas of Finland, while the American section covers state atlases from Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, Ohio, and West Virginia, as well as national atlases from Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela. The article emphasizes that these atlases not only reflect the research standards of geography and cartography in their respective countries but also serve as vital references for regional planning, economic development, historical research, and education. The author concludes by acknowledging that no single individual can possess sufficient expertise across all aspects of geography, cartography, and linguistics to render definitive critical judgments, yet such summaries offer valuable guidance to scholars, with a forthcoming review of world atlases and special atlases announced.
Tags
Comments
Loading...
0/2000