← Back
Journal Article

Geographical reviews: The Atlas of Finland

By Eugene van Cleef
Publication
Geographical Review
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
350-351

Finland · Version 2

1911

This review concerns the 1925 Atlas of Finland, and the 1910 edition enters it as the predecessor. The reviewer records that the 1910 atlas was a revision of the 1899 edition and was accompanied by two volumes of text printed in Finnish, Swedish and French; in the new edition that French text was replaced by an English one. He also lists mechanical differences: the statistical tables placed at the front of the 1910 atlas were moved into the text volume of the revision and replaced there by an index, and while the 1910 volume used more pages for maps and cartograms, its total number of maps was somewhat smaller. The paper of the newer edition, he adds, is of lower quality than that of earlier editions.

← Back to Finland
View whole-article summary

The review assesses the Geographical Society of Finland’s Atlas of Finland, dated 1925 because most of its statistics refer to that year, against its 1899 and 1910 predecessors. It reports that an English edition replaces the French 1910 edition; map explanations appear in Finnish, English, and Swedish, with a separate single-language text volume. Articles by subject-map editors and responsible bureau heads explain the maps’ sources and interpret their contents. The reviewer particularly praises the detailed vegetation and population map and the data assembled for it, notes the regional maps’ potentially controversial approaches to defining regions, and describes trade maps showing values per inhabitant of trading countries. Numerous maps cover public services and economic and social activities. Compared with 1910, statistical tables move to the text, an index is added, and smaller maps allow a greater map count on fewer pages without, in the reviewer’s judgment, reducing usefulness. The review praises the atlas overall while criticizing avoidable English translation errors, the predominance of block shading over dots in distribution maps, and poorer paper that weakens the clarity of color and type.

Comments

Loading...

0/2000