Cartographical progress: Atlas of Canada
- Publication
- The Geographical Journal
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-242
Canada · Version 2
1957–1959L. Dudley Stamp's review treats the 1957 English Atlas of Canada as a major official production, praising its comprehensive coverage and technical execution and outlining its Lambert Conformal Conic projection, 1:10M basic scale, removable linen-hinged sheets, historical and exploration maps, mapping-status plates, and thematic maps on physical, glacial, climatic, demographic, social and economic geography. He singles out the glacial geology, northern mapping, parks and faunal reserves, urban land-use pairs and gazetteer as notable. His main criticism concerns the lack of named individual responsibility and precise source acknowledgement for interpretive maps, especially the physiographic regions plate; he also questions the categories used for agricultural regions and regrets the continued use of Köppen's climatic classification. The review covers the English volume, not the 1959 French edition.
View whole-article summary
L. Dudley Stamp reviews the Atlas of Canada dated 1957 and published in 1959. He traces its predecessors of 1906 and 1915, Cabinet authorization in 1948, and eight or nine years of planning, research and cooperative compilation by the Department of Mines and Technical Surveys’ Geographical Branch. The 110 removable plates chiefly use the Lambert Conformal Conic projection and a basic scale of 1:10 million to present Canada’s physical background and economic development at mid-century. Stamp surveys historical-map redrawings, physical and climatic maps, advances in northern mapping, and demographic, social and economic data from 1951–57. He highlights detailed provincial gazetteers and paired urban land-use and development maps for eight cities. He praises the atlas’s comprehensive coverage, technical presentation and imaginative thematic treatment, while criticizing vague attribution of regional delineations and other interpretations, questioning the agricultural categories, and expressing reservations about the account of Köppen’s climatic classification.
Related Atlases
Comments
Loading...
0/2000


