← Back
Journal Article

World and Thematic Atlases: A Summary Survey

By Ena L. Yonge
Publication
Geographical Review
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
583–596

Bertelsmann International Atlas · Version 1

1961–1984

Ena L. Yonge praises the 1961 Der Grosse Bertelsmann Weltatlas for its planning, design, and drafting, noting that hill shading and layer tints allow extensive detail to remain clear. She also welcomes its country-by-country tables of geographical equivalents and language key. In comparing it with the Dutch edition, she notes the German edition’s 20 additional maps of Central Europe and finds the supplementary section’s separate name index confusing for reference work. Compared with De Agostini’s Grande atlante geografico, the Bertelsmann atlas includes many more place names, especially in the United States, although Yonge judges that consultation of current American road maps would have improved its U.S. coverage.

← Back to Bertelsmann International Atlas
View whole-article summary

This paper is a summary survey of world atlases and thematic atlases, continuing the author's earlier work on regional atlases. The article begins by noting that despite criticisms that geographers have made insufficient progress in advancing modern geographical study, the abundant output of atlas publications itself serves as a powerful rebuttal to such charges. The author then systematically reviews 33 world atlases and 31 thematic atlases. In the world atlas section, the author highlights three major comprehensive reference atlases—the Italian Touring Club's "Atlante internazionale," Bartholomew's "Times Atlas of the World," and the Soviet "Atlas mira"—as remaining unsurpassed. Additional reviews cover Hammond's "Ambassador World Atlas," the Curtis-Doubleday World Atlas, Britain's "Whitehall Atlas," the German Bertelsmann and Westermann atlases, the Italian De Agostini atlas, and various Soviet "Atlas mira" editions, encompassing everything from large reference works to portable desk atlases. In the thematic atlas section, the article covers ocean atlases, climate atlases, economic atlases, forestry atlases, and other subjects, with particular attention to the monumental three-volume Soviet "Morskoy atlas" (Marine Atlas) and oceanographic atlases produced by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, and the American Geographical Society. In evaluating each atlas, the author acknowledges both merits and shortcomings, noting issues such as inconsistent place-name spellings, absence of transportation information, and inconvenient index arrangements. Overall, this paper provides an invaluable reference guide for map librarians, geographers, and cartographers, revealing the general landscape and development trends of world atlas publishing during the late 1950s and early 1960s.

Comments

Loading...

0/2000