Socioeconomic Maps in Regional and National Atlases
Социально-экономические карты в региональных и национальных атласах
Mongolia
1990These compilation accounts, published in 1980, describe plans for the Mongolian national atlas as a joint undertaking by Mongolian and Soviet scholars. The contributors propose coordinated coverage of nature, resources, economic activity, population, history and public services, with explanatory texts and maps intended to support planning and forecasting. Particular attention goes to livestock husbandry, seasonal pastoral movement and changes in settlement. For population mapping, they recommend census data at settlement or soum level, delineation of actual settlement areas, and separate treatment of urban and rural populations. A technical account recommends 1:5,000,000 as the principal scale and discusses page layouts, thematic base maps, map documentation and graphic design. The final layout and scale series still awaited approval by the joint editorial board; these are proposals and preparatory work, not confirmation of the contents or format ultimately published in 1990.
View whole-article summary
The visible opening and closing materials describe plans for the National Atlas of the Mongolian People’s Republic and issues in medical-geographical mapping. Jointly prepared by Mongolian and Soviet scholars, the atlas was intended for bilingual publication with approximately 300 maps covering history, natural conditions and resources, the economy, population, education, culture, and health care. The opening emphasizes the use of long-term joint research, coordination of thematic content, scales, generalization methods, and legends, and cartographic techniques suited to Mongolia. Historical change was to be represented through maps for different dates, maps of dynamics, and explanatory texts. The atlas was intended to support planning, forecasting, and resource development, with supplementary information, methodological explanations, and guidance on use accompanying its sections. The closing discusses selecting geographical bases for medical-geographical maps. Disease distributions, environmental assessments, and population health should be mapped using relevant ecological, land-use, industrial, and urbanization information; empirical comparison may be needed to select a suitable base. Examples include using marmot habitats to indicate areas of probable plague-pathogen circulation and cited mapping experience linking anthrax distribution with agricultural land use and livestock numbers. The author advocates collaboration between medical geographers and cartographers in design, compilation, generalization, and editing, and identifies potential uses in setting priorities for medical services and health protection, research, and regional planning.
Comments
Loading...
0/2000
