Atlas du Canada

Canada · · 1959

Atlas du Canada

Related Reviews & Articles

Article

Atlases and maps. Atlas of Canada

Л. Р. Серебряный · 1960

This article reviews The Atlas of Canada, published in 1958. Initiated by the Canadian government in 1948, the atlas involved 150 geographers and 25 cartographers and comprises 450 maps, mostly in Lambert conformal conic projection at various scales. Its thematic sections cover physical geography, population, economy, transportation, and socio-cultural institutions, along with historical expedition routes and early maps. As a comprehensive cartographic reference to the country's territory and resources, it serves as an important source for regional studies.

Article

Canada in six atlases

N L Nicholson · 1970

This paper reviews six recent Canadian atlases—the Atlas of Canada (1958) and provincial atlases covering British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Alberta—and identifies patterns, trends, and principles emerging from their compilation. It argues that the atlases should be understood less as purely commercial reference works and more as products shaped by government policy and the differing aims assigned to them. The national atlas was designed as a broad overview of the physical basis and economic development of Canada, while provincial atlases reflect the regional concerns, resources, and educational responsibilities of individual provinces. Although the atlases appear superficially similar, they differ markedly in scale, projection, weight, and content, largely because each was independently organized and funded by government or university bodies. The article also stresses the pedagogical function of the volumes: since education in Canada is a provincial responsibility, the atlases were intended to support schools and public reference. Yet their geographic methodology places them beyond the existing school curricula and links them to the tradition of regional atlases. The analysis shows that the Ontario Economic Atlas comes closest to the ideal regional atlas, while Saskatchewan and Alberta retain more elements of the national atlas model. The article concludes that the recommendations of the IGU Commission on National Atlases, though not followed in every detail, had a clear and general influence on all six publications and that the idea of an atlas hierarchy is only partially realized. These findings underline the value of international guidance for national and regional atlas-making.

Article

Regional atlases: a summary survey

Ena L. Yonge · 1962

This article is a comprehensive review of regional atlases, written by Ena L. Yonge. The author begins by noting that, given the ever-increasing flood of atlases from around the world, individual reviews of each publication are impossible; therefore, a summary survey is adopted. She also stresses that no single reviewer can be sufficiently expert in all aspects of geography, cartography, and linguistics to render sound critical judgments. The roughly one hundred regional atlases discussed are grouped primarily by continent or large region and then arranged alphabetically by country. In the European section, the author evaluates national and thematic atlases from Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, and other countries, covering topics such as road transport, historical geography, climate, population, economy, and land use. She comments in detail on cartographic quality, scales, printing techniques, and practical utility. For example, the Austrian national atlas, directed by Hans Bobek and Erik Arnberger under the Commission for Land Planning of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, was published in five annual parts and demonstrates excellent cartography and printing. The Atlas de Belgique and the Atlas du Survey National supplement each other with plates on hydrogeology, phytogeography, agriculture, basic industries, waterways, and railways. The Climatic Atlas of Czechoslovakia is praised for its beautiful large-scale maps of temperature and precipitation. The article then turns to North America, focusing on state atlases in the United States, including Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, Ohio, and West Virginia. These atlases cover agriculture, forestry, economic resources, historical geography, and population, often compiled by universities or state agencies for educational and planning purposes. In the South American section, the author highlights notable publications such as the Atlas do Brasil, the Atlas de economía colombiana, and Venezuelan climatic and forest atlases. Throughout the review, the author acknowledges the scholarly value and cartographic achievements of many works while also pointing out occasional problems such as overly large formats or inappropriate scales. Overall, the article provides a broad and informative reference guide to regional atlases for scholars in geography, cartography, and related fields.

Tags

Comments

Loading…

0/2000