About

On this page

Maps and Atlases

Every atlas begins with maps.

For centuries, maps have been a vital tool for understanding, recording, and organizing space. They have shown people the way home, marked the boundaries of fields, and charted harbors and sea lanes for safe passage. They have served power no less than practical need: armies marched with them, borders were drawn on them, land was assessed and taxed through them, and empires were administered with them. In the digital age, maps have become more deeply embedded in daily life than ever. Today, billions of people use maps on phones and other devices.

Before the advent of modern surveying technologies, the world had to be measured step by step. Surveyors carried chains and theodolites across mountains, astronomers fixed positions by the sun, moon, and stars, and draftsmen translated their measurements into lines and symbols. A map that looks ordinary today might embody years, sometimes decades, of work. Cartographic techniques continued to evolve, from copperplate engraving, lithography, and multicolor offset printing to aerial photography, remote sensing, and satellite positioning. The forms maps took changed with them. Maps were once hand-drawn; they were also issued as loose sheets, bound into volumes, hung on walls, or folded into road maps for the journey. Today, they live on the screens in our pockets.

An atlas is more than a collection of maps bound together. The cartographer Ferjan Ormeling Jr. describes it as a systematic and coherent collection of geographical data: its maps are organized around a particular region or theme, follow consistent cartographic principles, and serve a particular purpose or narrative. Because its maps share a common language, they can be read against one another—region against region, theme against theme, or the same place across time. In this sense, an atlas is a machine for comparison: a single map answers a question; an atlas reveals how the answers relate.

Those relationships do not arise by accident. What an atlas includes, at what scale, and in what sequence, reflects the editor’s choices about how the world is to be organized and understood. An atlas therefore records not only the world, but also a way of seeing it. It is at once a visual archive and a geographical narrative, shaped by selection and arrangement; and every map within it is a sentence in that narrative.

The name Atlas carries a history of its own. In 1570, the Antwerp publisher Abraham Ortelius issued what is generally regarded as the first modern atlas: a systematically arranged, relatively uniform set of maps that sought to depict the known world as a coherent whole. In 1595, Gerardus Mercator’s unfinished magnum opus Atlas appeared after his death. Mercator took the name from an ancient tradition in which Atlas was a legendary North African king renowned for his knowledge of philosophy, mathematics, and astronomy. Over time, Atlas ceased to be merely a proper name and became the name of the form itself. Across the centuries that followed, the Atlas Mountains of North Africa, the legendary king Atlas, and the namesake Titan who bore the heavens—all long intertwined in classical tradition—became part of the cultural imagery surrounding the atlas. In time, the Titan supporting the globe became its most familiar emblem.

A figure carrying the world—what better emblem for a book that carries the world’s knowledge?

Why Paper Atlases

A paper atlas holds time and space still. The day it leaves the press, its borders, place-names, and statistics begin to age—but that is precisely its value. Every atlas preserves the world at the moment of publication: the geographical knowledge people then possessed, the boundaries recognized or claimed at the time, and the data they thought worth recording. Opened again years later, it shows us not only the world as it was, but also the way an age looked at the world.

Paper also brings its own constraints: page space is limited, and both the scale and the manner of presentation call for trade-offs. The editor must therefore decide what to include, what to emphasize, and what to leave out. A paper atlas is not a database that can be expanded without limit, but a carefully designed and arranged work. The cartographer must condense a country, or even the whole world, within the compass of a single book. Such constraints can even be a little cruel. As Ormeling observed, an island that happens to fall in the central fold of a map is always poorly seen—the “stepchild” of that map frame.

The appeal of the paper atlas also lies in the craft of the object itself. Large formats, fine lines, and layers of overprinted color all placed high demands on paper, printing, and binding. The finest atlases brought together the most advanced cartographic and printing technology of their day. The choice of projection, the arrangement of type, the treatment of boundary lines, the use of color to distinguish levels—together these details made up a cartographic aesthetic belonging to their age. Many such pages, even today, retain a fineness of detail and texture that screens have yet to match.

As time passes, complete and well-preserved specialist paper atlases become ever harder to find. Many were printed in limited runs and intended mainly for government agencies, schools, libraries, or specialist bodies, and since then they have been well used—opened flat, leafed through again and again, annotated, and exposed to light, damp, and wear. Copies that have survived intact and in good condition are therefore all the more precious. Each volume carries its own traces: ex libris stamps, annotations, signs of wear, even the marks of passing from hand to hand.

To collect these atlases is not merely to collect maps. It is also to preserve a way of encountering the world: the students, officials, planners, and researchers of earlier times, and countless others who opened them out of sheer curiosity, came to know their own countries—and the wider world—through pages such as these.

The Collection

The collection began in 2021, during the pandemic, with a few physical atlases acquired almost on impulse, and has continued to grow ever since. Launched in August 2026, this website is not a substitute for the books, but an extension of the collection into digital space. Here, atlases produced in different countries, decades, and cartographic traditions can be placed in conversation with one another, allowing worlds held still on paper to be read, compared, and studied anew. What began as a private collection has gradually become an effort to document, organize, and interpret these works with the care of a museum and the rigor of scholarship.

The holdings span the period from the early twentieth century to the present, with particular strength in atlases published during the middle and later decades of the twentieth century, when the printed atlas reached a peak of ambition and achievement. National atlases form the intellectual core of the collection, alongside a broader range of comprehensive and thematic atlases. The collection now encompasses works from more than 130 countries and a wide range of cartographic traditions. It is not, nor does it seek to be, an exhaustive survey. The selection reflects the collector’s own interests, favoring works of scholarly ambition, systematic scope, and cartographic distinction, especially those that reveal how a country sought to understand, order, and represent its own territory.

The museum collects more than just atlases. Alongside them is a substantial body of reviews, articles, accounts of their compilation, and scholarly discussions, many written when the atlases were newly published. These texts are not merely supplementary materials to the atlases; they are part of their history. By bringing these texts together with the works they examined, the collection preserves not only the contemporary reception of individual atlases, but also the standards by which cartographers and geographers of the time evaluated these works, the expectations they brought to the field, and the debates that surrounded them.

To understand an older atlas, we believe, it is often most revealing to return as closely as possible to the moment of its publication and to see it through the eyes of those who first encountered it: what they saw in it, what they admired, what they questioned, and how they judged its scientific merit, practical value, and cartographic craft. If an atlas holds still an age’s image of the world, contemporary criticism preserves something of the gaze that first met it, and of the responses it inspired. Bringing the two together again is one of the museum’s central purposes: to recover something of the moment when these worlds on paper were still new, and still waiting to be understood.

The National Atlas Tradition

National atlases represent one of the most ambitious cartographic endeavors a nation can undertake. Broad in scope and often officially sanctioned, they document a country’s geography, resources, population, and economy through systematic mapping.

The modern tradition took shape at the turn of the twentieth century. In 1899, the Finnish Geographical Society published the Atlas of Finland, generally regarded as the first modern national atlas. After the Second World War, amid reconstruction, decolonization, and the emergence of newly independent states, research and planning institutions expanded, printing technology advanced, and the tradition entered a period of remarkable growth. In 1956, the International Geographical Union established its Commission on National Atlases under the chairmanship of the Soviet cartographer K. A. Salishchev. The commission promoted new atlas projects and encouraged greater standardization in their content, symbol systems, and cartographic methods. Its creation both reflected the flourishing of national atlas production after the war and gave it further impetus.

Nation-states did not simply come into being; they were gradually shaped through processes of state-building and governance, and the national atlas was part of that process. Finland offered an early example: its atlas appeared before the country achieved independence, giving cartographic form to a nation that was not yet sovereign. By bringing together surveys, statistics, and knowledge from many disciplines, the national atlas gave coherence to information previously scattered across institutions and fields of study. It served as a scholarly reference for researchers and planners, a means through which a country could understand its own territory, and a calling card presented to the world.

In the final two decades of the twentieth century, the form and reach of the national atlas began to change. Once intended primarily for specialists, national atlases increasingly found a wider public. Alongside monumental folios came more manageable volumes, often accompanied by explanatory texts, photographs, and graphics, helping to make geographical knowledge more accessible.

Looking back over the twentieth century, it is no exaggeration to call it the century of the national atlas. At the turn of another century, digital technology transformed the national atlas once again, turning it into a gateway to databases in which maps could be searched, recombined, and continually updated. Yet the printed national atlas did not disappear. Precisely because it cannot be continually revised, it remains a country’s statement about itself at a particular moment: what it knows, what it values, what it claims, and how it wishes to be seen.

Physical Collection and Donations

The physical collection is housed in Shanghai, China. Researchers and interested visitors are welcome to arrange a visit by email. We also welcome donations of printed atlases and maps, as well as digital copies of atlases and cartographic literature.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the many websites and institutions that make atlases, maps, and cartographic literature freely available online. By digitizing, preserving, and sharing these materials, they have opened access to sources that might otherwise be difficult to find and have greatly supported the research behind this site.

We would also like to thank the libraries that supported our research: the New York Public Library (USA), the Shanghai Library (China), the Boston Public Library (USA), the British Library, the East China Normal University Library, the Wuhan University Library (China), the Archive for Geography (Germany), the Seattle Public Library (USA), the Main Library of the University of Szczecin (Poland), the University of Alberta Library (Canada), the National Library of Belarus, the National Library of Sweden, and Library and Archives Canada.

Contact

Last updated: