Back
Journal Article

Der Atlas von Finnland

By M. Kajamaa
Publication
Kartographische Nachrichten
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
163-171

Summary

This article, written by M. Kajamaa of the Geographical Society of Finland, systematically reviews the compilation history, technical evolution, and social functions of the Atlas of Finland from its first edition in 1899 to the fourth edition in 1960. The author points out that the atlas originated from a successful exhibition at the 6th International Geographical Congress in London in 1895, with the dual purpose of educating the Finnish people about their homeland and conveying accurate information about Finland to the international community, which held significant political importance during the era of Russian rule. Subsequently, the 1910 edition expanded with coastal water and city maps, the 1925 edition introduced mapping progress charts for the first time, and the 1960 edition achieved fundamental innovation. The fourth edition, co-published by the Geographical Society of Finland and the Department of Geography at the University of Helsinki, employed modern cartographic techniques such as layer engraving, strip-mask methods, and offset printing, increasing the number of maps from 275 to 415 while maintaining comprehensive content through scale reduction. Using the metaphor of "Finland's anatomy," the article emphasizes that the atlas not only presents static geographical distributions but also reveals developmental dynamics in population, agriculture, industry, and transportation through multi-temporal cross-sections. Specific examples include: peatland distribution and drainage projects (with drained areas reaching 14,000 km² by 1961), the correlation between agricultural zones and mineral soils, the southern concentration of population (half of the population resides in one-tenth of the land area), and regional disparities in industrialization (divided into three major economic zones: "Industrialized Finland," "Transition Zone," and "Natural Finland"). The article concludes by discussing organizational challenges in national atlas production, including the necessity of state funding, the professional contributions of the editorial team, and prospects for international coordination through the International Cartographic Association, while anticipating shorter revision cycles and the possibility of continuous atlas updates in the future.

Comments

Loading...

0/2000