Atlas of the USA
RUАтлас США
United States · Главное управление геодезии и картографии СССР · 1966
Related Reviews & Articles
Atlases of the western hemisphere: A summary survey
Richard W. Stephenson · 1972
This article reviews significant atlases published in the Western Hemisphere (including North America, South America, and Central America and the Caribbean) since Ena L. Yonge's summary survey in 1962. The survey is divided into two parts, with this part focusing on the Western Hemisphere, covering 147 volumes of general and thematic atlases of the entire hemisphere, continents, major regions, and individual countries, as well as atlases of individual states and provinces of the United States and Canada. Notable atlases mentioned include the 'Alpha Map Transparencies' series for teaching regional geography, Theodore R. Miller's 'Graphic History of the Americas,' David K. Adams and H. B. Rodgers' 'An Atlas of North American Affairs,' and the 'Oxford Regional Economic Atlas: United States & Canada.' The Canadian section details the fourth edition of 'The National Atlas of Canada,' the 'Atlas and Gazetteer of Canada,' historical atlases, and the 'Atlas of Alberta.' The South American section covers atlases from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Surinam, and Venezuela, such as the 'Atlas nacional do Brasil,' 'Atlas histórico geográfico y de paisajes peruanos,' and 'Atlas de Venezuela.' The article aims to describe the contents and features of these atlases rather than provide critical evaluations, and concludes by suggesting that the next decade may see an increase in the production of high-quality atlases by Western Hemisphere nations.
The first Soviet atlas of capitalist countries
С. Е. Благово́лин · 1966
This is an academic review of the Soviet Atlas of the USA, published in 1966. As the first comprehensive Soviet atlas of a capitalist country, it was produced by the Main Administration of Geodesy and Cartography in collaboration with several research institutes and the Geography Faculty of Moscow State University, involving over 50 scholars. The review notes that the atlas focuses primarily on socio-economic content, covering physical geography, population, industry, agriculture, economic regions, and foreign economic relations. Its overall quality is high, with particularly innovative maps on population density, transportation, and agriculture. However, the review also identifies several shortcomings, including insufficient general geographic maps, the absence of detailed city plans, unclear industrial classifications, and the failure to distinguish between aviation and rocket industries. The article concludes that the atlas represents a significant contribution to economic cartography and serves as a model for future national atlases, while recommending improvements for subsequent editions.
Reviews: Atlas of the United States
М. Б. Волсф · 1967
This paper is a collection of two book reviews. The first reviews a work on landscape-geographical zoning of Georgia, noting that the author divides Georgia into 6 landscape regions, 11 sub-regions, and 30 districts, and emphasizes the book's focus on detailed comprehensive physical-geographical descriptions, its vivid academic style, and its inclusion of zoning maps. It also suggests that the Russian edition should add sections on the national economic significance of landscape components, development prospects of regions, and bibliographies. The second review provides a detailed analysis of the 1966 Soviet-published 'Atlas of the USA', pointing out that it is the first Soviet economic atlas of a foreign country, with generally good quality but several shortcomings, such as issues with cartographic methods, terminology, and data comparability. The review offers suggestions for improvement and concludes that the atlas is suitable for school geography teachers and students, but insufficient for specialized research.
Tags
Comments
Loading...
0/2000