Atlas of Finland 1910
FISuomen kartasto 1910
Finland · 1911
Related Reviews & Articles
Suomen Kartasto 1960
Leo Aario · 1963
Atlas of Finland 1960. The Geographical Society in Finland appointed a committee on December 4, 1953, to manage the publication of a new Atlas of Finland. The chairman of the committee was at first Professor J. G. Granö, later Professor Väinö Auer. Professor Leo Aario was chosen as the editor of the atlas. The maps for the atlas, which were printed in the cartographic printing works of the Central Board of Land Survey, were completed in 1960. The atlas, with the text pages which were printed by the Publishing Company Otava, was published in February 1961. The Finnish text book appeared in May 1961 and the English in April 1962. The Swedish textbook is under preparation.
Suomen Kartasto, 1960, Atlas of Finland, 1960/1962
Georges Chabot · 1964
This article reviews the fourth edition of the Atlas of Finland, published in 1960 by the Geographical Society of Finland, comprising 39 plates and 421 maps with a separate text volume. The reviewer notes that although designated as the fourth edition, this work is essentially a completely new atlas, reflecting the profound changes in Finland following WWII, including territorial adjustments, population resettlement, and economic transformation, particularly industrialization. The atlas comprehensively covers physical geography, population, agriculture, industry, commerce, and regional divisions. The review praises its remarkable cartographic execution and the wealth of information it provides, considering it one of the finest national atlases ever produced. The author concludes that this atlas continues the patriotic tradition established with the first edition in 1899, serving as a definitive representation of modern Finland and a major achievement of Finnish geographical scholarship.
Entwicklung und Stand der Kartographie Finnlands
Ulrich Kriesche · 1944
This article surveys the historical development, institutional foundations, principal products, and contemporary condition of Finnish cartography from the sixteenth century to the early 1940s. Early European maps depicted Finland with highly distorted outlines, although military conflict, northern trade, taxation, land administration, and economic planning gradually created a demand for more reliable geographic information. Because Finland formed part of the Swedish realm, its early cartographic history was inseparable from the development of Swedish surveying. In the seventeenth century, Andreas Bureus placed Swedish-Finnish mapping on a more systematic and scientific footing by determining coordinates, training surveyors, and promoting standardized cadastral maps accompanied by descriptive records. Subsequent works by Anders Strengh, Lorenz Schroderus, Gripenhielm, and others improved the representation of settlements, property divisions, coastlines, and the national territory, even though errors in longitude and the absence of consistent geodetic control remained serious limitations. Warfare in the early eighteenth century largely interrupted surveying. After the Peace of Turku in 1743, however, reconstruction, land consolidation, and new triangulations revived cartographic activity. Surveys associated with Maupertuis, Gadolin, Justander, Wallin, and af Schultén supplied improved foundations, while Wetterstedt, Hermelin, and Hällström critically combined archival maps, field observations, measurements, and place-name research. Their work marked a transition toward modern cartography and more restrained, evidence-based relief representation. The article argues that Finnish national cartography was nearly immobilized during the Russian period, leaving Russian topographic and nautical maps—later released from secrecy—as indispensable sources well into the twentieth century. Following independence, Finland had to construct a modern national mapping system without the mature institutional continuity enjoyed by older states. Authorities experimented with surveys at 1:50,000 and plane-table sheets at 1:20,000, but the need for rapid coverage encouraged temporary reliance on 1:100,000 mapping. Economic maps, topographic series, general maps, wall maps, hand maps, and the Finnish atlas demonstrate significant progress, while the adoption of the Gauss–Krüger projection across most series represents an important step toward standardization. Nevertheless, accurate coverage remained geographically uneven: southern Finland, strategically important Ladoga Karelia, selected urban and economic districts, and Petsamo were comparatively well mapped, whereas extensive interior and northern areas still depended on the inadequate 1:400,000 general map. The study also examines inconsistent Finnish and Swedish place-name spellings, official bilingual naming practices, and efforts to standardize Skolt Sámi names. It concludes that Finnish cartography, like the young state itself, remained under construction, but displayed a strong commitment to scientifically sound, unified, and practically useful maps; wartime requirements were expected to generate further advances.
Tags
Comments
Loading...
0/2000